7/31/17 - "An End to Sibling Rivalry" "You're a loser!" Translation: "You 'lose' at my 'game'. I have a personal idea about life, a version of a metaphor that everyone believes in. The rules were written before you were born, and you have to play." How can I lose if I'm not even playing? My defiance of unjust authority runs so deep, that I must fundamentally disrespect all of your ideas, the worst of which is "Life is a game." If I feel better than you, I guess it's hard to honestly declare that I'm a loser, to any effect. I want to achieve genuine happiness, and I'll never look at it as trivial, or attainable through the guidelines prescribed by a failing society. If you are causing a demise of your own civilization, and believe firmly in the principles on which that process operates, Team "Game of Life" is nothing but a set of pathetic losers (Entertaining the notion to make the thing slam itself by its own device). Now what's the difference between me and you if I try to achieve things to feel good about myself? That's all the "game" really is anyway, right? I think it's the idea that I'm beating other people. If they end up in a worse way than me, they must have beaten their selves. I don't think of them as "losers"; I really don't care about the term at all. And I'm not trying to fight you! I want to get along with everyone, it seems a more optimal condition to promote for general well-being. Maybe then, under the premise devised by your ideology, I inadvertently win by not trying to create any loser, always offering my friendship and refusing to be anyone's foe. I won't war with you. I'll only prevent you from harming me if you assume the role of "enemy" against my will. I won't agree with you to respect you as an enemy, I'll just tell you that's not what you are, so you are nothing to me, making me more powerful and capable of stopping you. If someone tried to kill me, I would try to kill them first out of necessity. They would be nothing more than a loose end that I have to tie up for my own continued existence. Like falling and catching yourself - a physical practicality, you are nothing but a mindless force of nature. If you want enemies, and try to be the "winner" out of all the "losers", then you are this mindless force of nature. Believing in a division between individuals as "winners" and "losers" is what defines you as an enemy. Why are you trying to beat anyone?? The manufactured reality of "the game" is crime itself, is evil itself. Turn yourself in now, or you will face the wrath of God, who is only protecting His family from a mindless force of nature. I am here to live in peace, and I will have it whether you like it or not. Rid yourself of anything or anyone who brings turmoil into your life. If there is no reason to be upset, and you are upset, destroy the cause as quickly as you can. If you are upsetting others, you must have an enemy in your heart and mind that has possessed you. I do not seek out and destroy enemies as I know that they will destroy their selves. I only have to wait for natural process to occur. As you can see, I get along fine without ever having to attack anyone for victory. Those who attack me are turned away until they prove their selves to be my allies. My enemies end up serving me in this way, and I have always had what I need to reasonably attend to my own purpose. Thinking as I do could rid the world of enemies - the only reason you would not think in this way is due to your emotional attachment to regarding other life as something to be dominated and subdued against its own purpose. Always promote the qualities of others, and refuse to accept their evil. Even if that is what they are doing, it is not who they truly are. God has a purpose for everything He has created, and you should help Him fulfill it. If something is truly wrong, then it KNOWS that it is wrong, and there is no excuse for its fault. Never disobey the conscience, your mind is a gift that you should never be at odds with. It is a losing battle anyway - the mind will always prevail over a lack of reason, rendering the creature incapable of acting in its absence. Even if it succeeds in deliberately disobeying its virtue, it only destroys itself, not ever achieving the absolute goal of a blissful existence that all things would aspire to find. |